🇺🇸Daily News on AI on Education and Technology|Publisher: Mikel Amigot
iblnews.org
TOP NEWSPLATFORMSVIEWSEVENTS

99% of MIT Undergrads Have Taken an MITx Class – Impressive Numbers After Two Decades

  In May 2012, Susan Hockfield, former president at MIT, made a statement that turned into a belief at the institution: “Online education is not an enemy of residential education but rather an inspiring and liberating ally.” The idea caught fire, and MIT increased its commitment to online education. The same year, MIT teamed up with Harvard University to launch edX, the free open-source platform for digital learning. It also increased the number of online classes. Today, MIT’s OpenCourseWare website hosts 2,450 classes and receives 2 million monthly visitors, while edX contains 90 MIT courses. MITx, the online learning unit of the institution, reports an average number of people who register for an MITx MOOC every day of 3,307. So far 176 MOOCs have been produced. More interestingly, 99% of MIT undergrads have taken a class that uses MITx tools. Also, 15% of undergrads took an MITx MOOC before being admitted. The most popular MITx class on edX.org, Introduction to Computer Science using Python has achieved a total of 1.3 million enrollments to date. This number shows that the impact is global. In fact, 75% of learners live outside the U.S. In total, 3.8 million unique learners from 200 countries have earned 195,000 certificates. Only 1,805 learners earned MicroMasters credentials, and 76 went on to complete MIT master’s degrees on campus. In 1999, President Charles Vest asked a faculty committee how to best use the Internet to further MIT’s mission. He got risky advice: put all of MIT’s course materials online for free. MIT’s Open Learning initiative has served amazingly well both its students and learners around the world. It is one of the breakthroughs in education in the last two decades.

99% of MIT Undergrads Have Taken an MITx Class – Impressive Numbers After Two Decades
A Practical Course on edX to Learn How to Deploy an IBM Watson-Based Chatbot

A Practical Course on edX to Learn How to Deploy an IBM Watson-Based Chatbot

2U Announces a Deal with RIT to Deliver an Online Master's Degree in Architecture

2U Announces a Deal with RIT to Deliver an Online Master's Degree in Architecture

Coursera for Campus Is Not an Alternative LMS to Blackboard, Canvas and Moodle, Says Maggioncalda

Coursera for Campus Is Not an Alternative LMS to Blackboard, Canvas and Moodle, Says Maggioncalda

Automattic, the Company Behind WordPress, Valued at $3 Billion After Its Last Funding

Automattic, the Company Behind WordPress, Valued at $3 Billion After Its Last Funding

Mikel Amigot | IBL News Automattic, the company behind WordPress.com, WooCommerce, the Jetpack plugin and soon Tumblr, announced on Thursday that it closed a $300 million funding round in Series D from Salesforce Ventures. The investment puts Automattic’s valuation at $3 billion post-funding. The company will have close to 1,200 employees when the Tumblr acquisition closes. In August, Automattic purchased Tumblr from Verizon for $3 million, a fraction of what it was worth when Yahoo bought it for $1.1 billion in 2013. Tumblr is seen as complementary to WordPress.com; therefore, no major changes are planned. The freemium business model with an open-source philosophy at its core has been working very well for Automattic Inc. WordPress, as a free open-source software platform, is owned by a non-profit group called The WordPress Foundation, while the popular domain WordPress.com is privately held. Automattic makes most of its money by selling subscriptions to software services related to the WordPress platform, like WooCommerce, an open-source e-commerce plugin for WordPress; Jetpack, a customization and security plugin for WordPress; and enterprise WordPress for businesses, such as WordPress.com VIP. It also gets revenues by selling advertising against some of the free blogs that users create on WordPress.com.

2U Will Release More Data As The OPM Industry Will Face Growing Scrutiny

2U Will Release More Data As The OPM Industry Will Face Growing Scrutiny

2U, the most visible company in the OPM (Online Program Management) industry, announced on September 11 what it called "an unprecedented new Framework for Transparency", which "will offer students, universities, and policymakers data on outcomes, quality, institutional independence, and more for the degree and non-degree offerings." "2U becomes the first OPM to openly call for, and embrace, greater transparency," the Lanham, Maryland-based company said in a statement. "We call upon other OPMs across the industry to join us in committing to greater transparency," 2U Co-Founder and CEO Christopher "Chip" Paucek added. The new framework is grounded in six pillars: University Oversight & Accountability; Marketplace Openness; Access; Affordability; Quality; and Outcomes. Facing growing scrutiny, 2U's move isn't as big as it looks, given that the company is publicly traded (NASDAQ: TWOU) and needs to recover investors’ confidence after losing over half of its market value in the last seven weeks. Secondly, the controversial company needs to self-regulate, getting ahead of potential regulatory changes. In addition, it would be an attempt to put pressure on competitors such as Pearson, Wiley, Academic Partnerships, Noodle and Bisk to do the same. "Paucek believes that releasing more information about the company and its operations will help prove just how 'excellent' it is," wrote Doug Lederman in Inside Higher Ed. A Public Database of Online Program Contracts In relation to the OPM industry, the Century Foundation published a report yesterday titled "Dear Colleges: Take Control of Your Online Courses." It elaborated on the relationships between 79 public colleges and OPM companies and included a database of scores of contracts outlining the terms of the arrangements. "Our hope is that this action-focused report will assist schools and those who care about them to jumpstart a paradigm shift in how online education in the United States is done," the Foundation said. • EdSurge: Layoffs, Deferred Tuition and More Transparency Among 2U Changes Since Stock Fall • Education Dive: A look inside public universities' OPM contracts  

The Power of Data and Analytics Can Save Higher Education, Says Educause, AIR and NACUBO

The Power of Data and Analytics Can Save Higher Education, Says Educause, AIR and NACUBO

A Conference to Find Viable Business Models to Commercialize Open Source Software

A Conference to Find Viable Business Models to Commercialize Open Source Software

Learners at Coursera, Canvas and Blackboard Will Be Able to Ask Alexa for Course Updates

Learners at Coursera, Canvas and Blackboard Will Be Able to Ask Alexa for Course Updates

MIT Top Officials Were Aware of Epstein’s Ties to the Media Lab and Accepted Those Donations, Says Peter Cohen

MIT Top Officials Were Aware of Epstein’s Ties to the Media Lab and Accepted Those Donations, Says Peter Cohen

Peter Cohen, a former MIT Media Lab fund-raiser and currently a central figure in the MIT/Epstein unfolding scandal, said on Tuesday that he was following university’s practices on accepting donations. Through a written statement to The Boston Globe, Peter Cohen, former MIT Media Lab director of development and strategy and now director of development for computer science at Brown University, said that when he joined the Media Lab in 2014, it already had established procedures for handling Epstein’s contributions (despite the disgraced financier was convicted in 2008 to a 13-month jail term for soliciting sex from a minor.) Those policies regarding donations were “authorized by and implemented with the full knowledge of MIT central administration.” According to e-mails released by a whistleblower on The New Yorker and The New York Times, Cohen acted as an intermediary between the Media Lab and its former director Joi Ito and MIT’s central administration on donor issues. Cohen also worked with Ito on Epstein-related matters, such as developing a written proposal for funding from Microsoft founder Bill Gates, that Epstein said he could arrange. “Notwithstanding my personal discomfort regarding Mr. Epstein and his involvement with MIT, I did not believe I was in a position to change MIT’s policies and practices,” Cohen said in an e-mailed statement. “I did not witness anything I understood to be illegal, and I never solicited gifts from Mr. Epstein.” MIT president L. Rafael Reif said on Monday that the university had retained a law firm [Goodwin Procter] to investigate Epstein’s interactions with MIT.  Despite that criminal history, Ito said he wooed Epstein as a donor for the lab when he met him in 2013. MIT’s funding practices have attracted media attention in the last months. In July The New York Times Magazine published a thorough article about it. On Friday, The New Yorker mentioned that corporate donors—called “members”—who pay at least $250,000 a year make up the majority of the Media Lab’s annual budget. Yesterday, two columnists wrote on Fortune, “while these institutions project the appearance of being focused on academic pursuits—finding the truth, asking tough questions, pursuing independent lines of exploration, and so on—in reality, they are corporate lap dogs fetching the balls their masters throw.”   • Dan Kennedy: Three questions still to be answered about the meltdown of the MIT Media Lab

An MIT Professor Will Temporarily Lead the Media Lab In the Midst of the Crisis

An MIT Professor Will Temporarily Lead the Media Lab In the Midst of the Crisis

MIT announced on September 10 that it appointed a transitional executive committee of faculty and senior staff to lead the MIT Media Lab, after the resignation of its director Joi Ito over his financial ties to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Meanwhile, an independent investigation by law firm Goodwin Procter, announced by MIT's President Rafael Reif on Saturday, is still ongoing. [Update: Email from President Reif to the MIT Community] Pattie Maes, professor of media arts and sciences at MIT, will serve as chair of the committee, managing the future lab governance model and search for new director. Four more members, along with their areas of responsibility, will be: Deb Roy, professor of media arts and sciences: executive director of operations and communications; Tod Machover, professor and head of the Program in Media Arts and Sciences: community engagement and culture change; Maria Zuber, MIT’s vice president for research: policies, practices, and culture of research; and Ramona Allen, the School of Architecture and Planning’s assistant dean for human resources and, as of Oct. 1, MIT’s vice president of human resources: administrative organization. “These have been exceptionally difficult times for the Media Lab, and I want to thank the members of the community for their dedication to the lab and for their commitment to real change,” said Hashim Sarkis, dean of the School of Architecture and Planning. A Whistleblower Revealed the Ties of MIT to Epstein In an internal meeting at the lab, on September 4, Ito admitted to having taken $525,000 from Epstein for the Media Lab and an additional $1.2 million for his private ventures. According to an article at MIT Technology Review, emails provided to the New Yorker and the New York Times by whistleblower Signe Swenson, a former development associate at the Media Lab, showed Ito, along along with Peter Cohen, a former development official at the lab, acknowledging that Epstein’s money needed to remain anonymous. The hidden ties with Epstein –who died in jail on August 10– were so widely known at the Media Lab that staff in Ito’s office began to call him “he who must not be named” or “Voldemort,” according to the New Yorker. Questions also remain about how the donations evaded detection by MIT. The lack of transparency around the close relationships between academic institutions and an elite network of donors is a constant in the higher education industry, according to observers. MIT and Harvard Professors and Thinkers Supported Joi Ito Epstein had a reputation for cultivating relationships with scientists. He also funded many scientific projects, including some at MIT and Harvard University. He was linked to deceased MIT professor and AI pioneer Marvin Minsky, who was recently accused of having sex with one of Epstein’s underage victims. Now Epstein’s support has become a source of public shame for the Media Lab. Mainly, because documents showed that the MIT Media Lab – an elite group within MIT –, was aware of Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender. Additionally, Epstein's directed contributions to the lab far exceeded the amounts M.I.T. has publicly admitted. Another angle of the controversy refers to the group of prominent professors and thinkers involved with MIT and Harvard who signed a letter in support of MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito in mid-August. The letter sought to gather support for Ito, who apologized for accepting funds from the now-deceased sexual criminal. This list includes as signers Harvard Law professor and Creative Commons founder Lawrence Lessig, Whole Earth Catalog founder Stewart Brand, Media Lab co-founder Nicholas Negroponte, Harvard law professor and EFF board member Jonathan Zittrain, and synthetic biology pioneer George Church.    MIT is calling for an independent investigation following explosive allegations that two MIT Media Lab officials made efforts to make sure Jeffrey Epstein's name was not associated with donations he made or helped solicithttps://t.co/kXFp6uP1ye pic.twitter.com/fBW8SVlljm — New Day (@NewDay) September 9, 2019 "There were so many anonymized secret references to Epstein and his contacts at the lab that they started to refer to him as 'Voldemort,' or 'He who must not be named,'" said @RonanFarrow. Hear him on how the @medialab hid donations from Jeffrey Epstein: https://t.co/lHpuOUaFcM — WGBH News (@wgbhnews) September 10, 2019

......

Today's Summary

Friday, November 21, 2025

Education technology today is marked by rising AI adoption among educators and innovative personalized learning approaches.

Video News

Loading videos...

Loading videos...

Today in AI & EdTech

Friday, November 21, 2025

AI is transforming the education technology landscape as more teachers adopt intelligent tools, driving forward and adaptive learning experiences.

AI & EdTech Videos

OpenAI Launches Educational GPT Model

OpenAI Launches Educational GPT Model

Adaptive Learning Platforms Show 40% Improvement

Adaptive Learning Platforms Show 40% Improvement

Microsoft Education Copilot Beta Launch

Microsoft Education Copilot Beta Launch

Today in Education

U.S. Department of Education Announces New Funding for STEM Programs

The initiative aims to support science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education.

Global Education Summit Highlights Digital Learning Innovations

Leaders from around the world discuss the future of remote and hybrid learning models.

New Study Shows Benefits of Early Childhood Education

Research indicates significant long-term academic and social advantages for students.

Sections

    About Our News Agency

      Stay Updated

      Get the latest education technology news delivered to your inbox.

      IBL News

      This work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0). IBL News is a nonprofit initiative founded in 2014.

      CC BY 4.0
      © 2025 Class Generation, LLC d.b.a. ibl.ai, ibleducation.com and iblnews.org - 845 Third Avenue, 6th Fl, New York, NY 10022 - Tel 646-722-2616 - Made in U.S.A. • Terms of Use • Privacy Policy