IBL News | New York
“MIT and Harvard should not have undue influence or control,” Feldstein said in a recent article while advising to follow the Apache Foundation’s incubation process “to ensure a healthy open-source community and governance practices.”
“Once the software has passed through incubation—which is usually a multi-year process—then a new board should be elected from the community to chart its future.”
“The initial board could consist of former EdX members and Open EdX contributors.”
Michael Feldstein, the author of the influential blog eLiterate [in the picture above], says that Open edX is “a passion project”, and therefore MIT and Harvard are in need of an outside auditor to steward the platform.
With another portion of the proceeds of the sale of edX Inc to 2U, MIT and Harvard should create “an educational research grant-giving body focused on improving global education and educational equity.”
“MIT and Harvard faculty and staff would be permanently disqualified from receiving grant dollars from the foundation. A credible board of academic experts and NGO leaders would oversee the distribution of funds.”
Regarding the transaction itself, Feldstein points to the disagreement inside MIT and Harvard and highlights the “reputational damage done.”
“My sources inside these institutions, particularly MIT, tell me there’s quite a bit of internal upset and foment over the transaction.”
.
Great piece by @mfeldstein67 on @edXOnline purchase by @2Uinc. The key issue remains: universities have largely failed at digital. The public good language of Harvard/MIT was lip service, not real intent. Like it or not, universities (in USA) are basically corporate/capitalist.
— George Siemens (@gsiemens) September 9, 2021
You may recall I was advocating for universities developing in-house capacity for digital education (including at scale) back in 2014. Self-hosting Open edX was one avenue. My university ignored me. I still host a site for my courses! https://t.co/ounfEdKdxN
— Lorena Barba (@LorenaABarba) September 9, 2021
MOOCs lose money. And if they’re not hosted in some unified catalog where people can find them, you’ll get fewer enrollments and they’ll lose more money. That’s fine as long as the university has a sustainability plan to cover their costs. Most don’t.
— Michael “Is it over yet?” Feldstein (@mfeldstein67) September 9, 2021
I didn’t mention money, but with regards to enrollments, my indie/self-hosted MOOC did pretty well—in fact, way better than half of edX courses, unified catalog and all 🤷🏻♀️https://t.co/Gc5DVxXzEi
— Lorena Barba (@LorenaABarba) September 9, 2021
Congrats to @ArgosEducation team on investment from @WGULabs – will be exciting to see developments from @curtisspbarnes @mfeldstein67 and teamhttps://t.co/TGAukocNvn
— Phil Hill (@PhilOnEdTech) September 9, 2021